Register
When we talk about the history of science, we usually talk about individuals who contributed to scientific discoveries. Is this a good or bad way of thinking about science? What are some pros or cons?
186k views
3 votes
When we talk about the history of science, we usually talk about individuals who contributed to scientific discoveries. Is this a good or bad way of thinking about science? What are some pros or cons?

User Bassam Alugili
by
3.8k points

1 Answer

3 votes
Stop stop it’s production of pro or cons k sc
User Jayant Kumar
by
3.5k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

3.6m questions

4.6m answers

Other Questions

As in most areas of biology, the study of mitosis and the cell cycle involves a lot of new terminology. Knowing what the different terms mean is essential to understanding and describing the processes
Climate change is a ___ environmental change
Cerebral aneurysm is most frequently the result of a. subarachnoid hemorrhage. b. subdural hemorrhage. c. meningitis. d. embolic stroke.
Which subsystems are most effected by this use of water
1. Which of the following can happen if the kidneys fail? a. Toxic wastes can accumulate in plasma. b. Blood-plasma ion levels can increase. c. Kidney dialysis may be necessary. d. All of the above
Link Copied!