21.5k views
0 votes
For me, reading has always been a path toward liberation and fulfillment. To learn to read is to start down the road of liberation, a road which should be accessible to everyone. No one has the right to keep you from reading, and yet that is what is happening in many areas in this country today. There are those who think they know best what we should read. These censors are at work in all areas of our daily lives. Which best describes how Anaya uses rhetorical appeal to convince readers that censors want to limit what people can read?

User Thebjorn
by
5.8k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

b, a strong opinion is presented to appeal to the reader’s sense of justice

Step-by-step explanation:

User Michael Shimmins
by
6.9k points
4 votes

Answer:an appeal to emotion

Choices for the answer are: an appeal to emotion

an appeal to ethics

an appeal to the author's character

an appeal to logic

Explanation: Anaya appeals to one's own emotions when she state things that will actual move the person emotionally such as "To learn to read is to start down the road of liberation, a road which should be accessible to everyone."

She want peole to be given freedom to read and want those who forbids the to feel or sympathize atleast with what this is like to those who are not given a chance to read.

User NickSuperb
by
7.9k points