Final answer:
Violating a locally-ordered curfew is typically considered delinquent behavior because it contravenes a legal ordinance and may lead to formal sanctions, distinguishing it from merely unruly behavior, which might defy social norms without breaking a law.
Step-by-step explanation:
When considering whether violating a locally-ordered curfew is delinquent or unruly behavior, it's important to understand the social contexts and norms. Delinquent behavior is typically associated with actions that violate legal statutes and may result in formal sanctions. On the other hand, unruly behavior is often seen as a lesser form of deviance, and might breach social norms or expectations without necessarily breaking a law.
In the context of a curfew, the violation would likely be considered a delinquent act because it goes against an officially mandated ordinance, which is enforceable by law. The actions of civil rights activists in the 1960s, like those of Rosa Parks, are historical examples of civil disobedience for a moral cause, but today's curfew violations are usually seen in a different light—more akin to public order infractions rather than political statements.
Sociologists argue that deviance is relative and what may be considered deviant in one scenario, such as speaking loudly at a funeral, could be appropriate in another, like at a post-funeral gathering. Still, formal sanctions, like arrests for curfew violations, indicate that society perceives some acts not just as deviations from norms, but as impermissible breaches of legal codes, meriting the delinquency label.