Question

Match each case with the precedent it established.

Mapp v. Ohio
Officers can gather evidence that is in
plain view
Horton v. California
Officers can legally carry out a stop and
frisk
Terry v. Ohio
Convictions cannot be based on
evidence from an illegal search.

Answer 1

Mapp v. Ohio- convictions cannot be based on evidence from an illegal search

Terry v. Ohio- officers can legally carry out a stop and frisk

Horton v. California- officers can gather evidence that is in plain view

Explanation: got it right on ed

Answer 2

Mapp v. Ohio- convictions cannot be based on evidence from an illegal search

Terry v. Ohio- officers can legally carry out a stop and frisk

Horton v. California- officers can gather evidence that is in plain view

Explanation: answers on edge