216k views
1 vote
Decide which objection you would make after the following witness statements:

1. Lawyer: What happened next?

Witness: John heard something and went outside and yelled out that he saw Ken break the garage door.

Objection: __________________________________________

2. Lawyer: What did you see when you returned home?

Witness: The garage door was broken. It must have been Ken who broke it because no one else was home at the time.

Objection: _________________________________________

3. Lawyer: What did you make for breakfast that morning?

Witness: I made scrambled eggs. I usually make pancakes on Saturdays, but that morning I felt like eggs.

Objection: ________________________________________

4. Lawyer: How long have you lived in the neighborhood?

Witness: About five years. It is a great place to live. It's one of the safest neighborhoods there is.

Objection: _______________________________________

2 Answers

4 votes
*explanation*: We need some legit evidence considering the witness is only speaking without anything to back up the explanation, I would say the witness is innocent when he can provide the court with some real evidence
User Max Smolens
by
7.8k points
3 votes
1) Hearsay
2) Speculation
3) Immaterial
4) Misleading
User Amberlynn
by
8.4k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.