Answer:
(a) Null Hypothesis,
:
= $20,000 {means that the mean price of a three-year-old sport utility vehicle (in good condition) is $20,000}
Alternate Hypothesis,
:
$20,000 {means that the mean price of a three-year-old sport utility vehicle (in good condition) is different from $20,000}
(b) Critical values of t are -2.08 and 2.08 at 21 degree of freedom.
(c) The test statistics is 1.508.
(d) We fail to reject the null hypothesis.
(e) We conclude that the mean price of a three-year-old sport utility vehicle (in good condition) is $20,000.
Explanation:
We are given that a random sample of 22 similar vehicles has a mean price of $20,640 and a standard deviation of $1990.
We have to test the claim of a used car dealer who says that the mean price of a three-year-old sport utility vehicle (in good condition) is $20,000.
Let
= mean price of a three-year-old sport utility vehicle.
SO, Null Hypothesis,
:
= $20,000 {means that the mean price of a three-year-old sport utility vehicle (in good condition) is $20,000}
Alternate Hypothesis,
:
$20,000 {means that the mean price of a three-year-old sport utility vehicle (in good condition) is different from $20,000}
The test statistics that will be used here is One-sample t test statistics as we don't know about the population standard deviation;
T.S. =
~
where,
= sample mean price of vehicles = $20,640
s = sample standard deviation = $1,990
n = sample of vehicles = 22
So, test statistics =
~
= 1.508
Now at 0.05 significance level, the t table gives critical values of -2.08 and 2.08 at 21 degree of freedom for two-tailed test. Since our test statistics lies within the range of critical values of t, so we have insufficient evidence to reject our null hypothesis as it will not fall in the rejection region due to which we fail to reject the null hypothesis.
Therefore, we conclude that the mean price of a three-year-old sport utility vehicle (in good condition) is $20,000.