169k views
3 votes
Pease circle the statements incompatible with the Kelvin-Planck Statement. (A) No heat engine can have a thermal efficiency of 100%. (B) It is impossible for any device that operates on a cycle to receive heat from a single reservoir and produce a net amount of work without rejecting waste heat to a cool reservoir. (C) The impossibility of having a 100% efficient heat engine is always due to friction or other dissipative effects such as the system is perfectly designed or the material needed for the system design is not available. (D) Any device that violates the Kelvin-Planck statement also violates the Clausius statement, and vice versa.

User Mawardy
by
5.1k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

(C) The impossibility of having a 100% efficient heat engine is always due to friction or other dissipative effects such as the system is perfectly designed or the material needed for the system design is not available.

Step-by-step explanation:

The above option was never stated in the law

User BernalCarlos
by
5.8k points