152k views
4 votes
Weatherwise is a magazine published by the American Meteorological Society. One issue gives a rating system used to classify Nor'easter storms that frequently hit New England and can cause much damage near the ocean. A severe storm has an average peak wave height of μ = 16.4 feet for waves hitting the shore. Suppose that a Nor'easter is in progress at the severe storm class rating. Peak wave heights are usually measured from land (using binoculars) off fixed cement piers. Suppose that a reading of 33 waves showed an average wave height of x = 17.1 feet. Previous studies of severe storms indicate that σ = 3.9 feet. Does this information suggest that the storm is (perhaps temporarily) increasing above the severe rating? Use α = 0.01. Solve the problem using the critical region method of testing (i.e., traditional method). (Round your answers to two decimal places.)

User HopeKing
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

Explanation:

We would set up the hypothesis test. This is a test of a single population mean since we are dealing with mean

For the null hypothesis,

µ = 16.4

For the alternative hypothesis,

µ ≠ 16.4

This is a 2 tailed test

Since the population standard deviation is given, z score would be determined from the normal distribution table. The formula is

z = (x - µ)/(σ/√n)

Where

x = sample mean

µ = population mean

σ = population standard deviation

n = number of samples

From the information given,

µ = 16.4

x = 17.1

σ = 3.1 feet

n = 31

z = (17.1 - 16.4)/(3.1/√31) = 0.89

The calculated test statistic is 0.89 for the right tail and - 0.89 for the left tail

Since α = 0.01, the critical value is determined from the normal distribution table.

For the left, α/2 = 0.01/2 = 0.005

The z score for an area to the left of 0.005 is - 2.575

For the right, α/2 = 1 - 0.005 = 0.995

The z score for an area to the right of 0.995 is 2.575

In order to reject the null hypothesis, the test statistic must be smaller than - 2.575 or greater than 2.575

Since - 0.89 > - 2.575 and 0.89 < 2.575, we would fail to reject the null hypothesis.

Therefore, this information does not suggest that the storm is (perhaps temporarily) increasing above the severe rating

User Stephan Du Toit
by
7.2k points