Answer:
Not enough statistical evidence to prove that treatment 2 sample mean u2 is less than treatment 1 sample mean u1. So the claim may be supported.
Explanation:
Solution:-
- The sample size of two treatments, n = 16
- The mean of sample treatment 1, u1
- The mean of sample treatment 2 , u2
- The significance level, α = .05
- State the hypothesis:
Null hypothesis : u2 - u1 > 0
Alternate hypothesis : u2 - u1 ≤ 0
- The rejection region of the T- critical for lower tailed test.
significance level, α = .05
degree of freedom v = n - 1 = 16 - 1 = 15
T-critical = - 1.75
- The T-test value is compared with T-critical:
T-test = 1.94
T- critical = -1.75
T-test > T-critical .. ( Null not rejected )
- Not enough statistical evidence to prove that treatment 2 sample mean u2 is less than treatment 1 sample mean u1. So the claim maybe supported.