Answer:
In Margaret Miller's employment contract with Hehlen, it was made clear by the franchisee that the nature of her business was a branded tax franchise, known as H&R Block. Hehlen has worked for Miller for 15 years. So every year, Miller and Hehlen had to sign an employment agreement which was drawn up by H&R Block. The 2001 agreement was between Hehlen and “Margaret Miller, doing business as H&R Block".
Therefore, Hehlen's employment contract was signed with Miller's franchise and NOT Miller's sole proprietorship.
After H&R Block terminated her franchise agreement, Miller had no right to enforce the contract provisions because:
1. Hehlen's contract was with Miller's franchise and NOT with the sole proprietorship.
2. Miller was no longer "doing business as H&R Block" when she filed to enforce the employment agreement against Hehlen.
3. She could only enforce the employment agreement on her continuing business as H&R Block.
Therefore, Miller cannot enforce the contract provisions after H&R Block terminated her franchise agreement because she WAS NO LONGER "doing business as H&R Block"