Willy should buy(a) no insurance since the cost per dollar of insurance exceeds the probability of a flood
Step-by-step explanation:
Willy's only source of wealth is his chocolate factory. He has the utility function p(cf)1/2 + (1 − p)(cnf)1/2,, where p is the probability of a flood, 1 - p is the probability of no flood, and cf and in are his wealth contingent on a flood and on no flood, respectively. The probability of a flood is p = 1/6. The value of Willy's factory is $500,000 if there is no flood and $0 if there is a flood. Willy can buy insurance where if he buys $x worth of insurance, he must pay the insurance company $2x/17 whether there is a flood or not but he gets back $x from the company if there is a flood. Willy should buy
The answer for the above statement is option ( A.) no insurance since the cost per dollar of insurance exceeds the probability of a flood .
It is because the probability of flood as given in the question is only 1/6, whereas the chances of no flood are 5/6. So that means that he should not buy the insurance because the probability of the flood is comparatively less than the amount Willy has to pay to the insurance company and the amount paid back to willy by the insurance company is $ x worth of insurance