Final answer:
The least likely outcome of engineering yeast cells to express M cyclin during S phase is G1 cyclins being expressed during S phase, as this procedure does not affect G1 cyclin expression.
Step-by-step explanation:
In an experiment where yeast cells are engineered to express M cyclin during S phase by replacing the M cyclin gene promoter with that of S cyclin, the least likely outcome would be (c) G1 cyclins being expressed during S phase. Changing the promoter of M cyclin to that of S cyclin does not affect G1 cyclin expression. Therefore, only the expression pattern of M cyclin would change, leading to the presence of both M cyclin-Cdk and S cyclin-Cdk complexes during the S phase, resulting in some substrates normally phosphorylated in M phase being phosphorylated in S phase instead. Importantly, S-Cdk targets would surely be phosphorylated during S phase, as this is a normal occurrence.