58,327 views
17 votes
17 votes
Explain why the facts of Shelby Co. led to the ruling of the case.

User Pcgben
by
2.7k points

1 Answer

14 votes
14 votes

Answer:

The Supreme Court's decision in Shelby County v. Holder, (2013) held that the coverage formula set forth in Section 4(b) of the Act was unconstitutional, and as a consequence, no jurisdictions are now subject to the coverage formula in Section 4(b) or to Sections 4(f)(4) and 5 of Act.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Aiolias
by
2.8k points