Final answer:
The false statement regarding Keesh's gain in status is likely that he asks to rejoin the council, as egalitarian gatherer-hunter societies do not typically have formal leaders and instead make decisions through group consensus.
Step-by-step explanation:
The question pertains to the character Keesh from a story, and which statement about how Keesh gains status in his village is false. Given the principles of egalitarianism in gatherer-hunter societies, like those of the Hadza, it is likely that sharing and fairness are valued, as generosity is praised. Therefore, the false statement about Keesh might be that he asks to rejoin the council, as egalitarian societies do not typically have formal leadership roles and decisions are made through public discussions leading to group consensus.
In this context, Keesh distributing his meat fairly aligns with the notion that all gathered and hunted foods are shared among members of the band and generosity is admired. The idea that Keesh goes on many successful hunts would contribute to his status in a society valuing sharing and success in providing resources. Since gatherer-hunter societies value egalitarianism and communal decision-making without centralized leadership, the statement that Keesh asks to rejoin the council is less reflective of such a societal structure and may therefore be considered the false statement in the context provided.