222k views
2 votes
_________is the judicial philosophy that argues the Court should go beyond the words of the Constitution or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.

A. Judicial restraint
B. Judicial constraint
C. Judicial appeal
D. Judicial activism

User Bower
by
8.3k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

D. Judicial Activism

Step-by-step explanation:

Judicial Activism is the judicial philosophy that argues the Court should go beyond the words of the Constitution or a statue to consider the broader societal implications of its decisions.

It is the opposite of Judicial Restraint, as a judicial philosophy theory, which limits the power of judges to act only as per existing legal provisions under constitution.

User Nicolas Zozol
by
8.4k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.