Question

"The economic decline [of Kush] may have been hastened by overgrazing of the land and by the progressive

desiccation of the Butana. But the most serious threat came from Axum, a kingdom that rose to power in the
highlands of Ethiopia to the southeast. . . . Axum challenged Kush's monopoly of trade in the African interior.
The two inevitably clashed, and Axumites, on the offensive, carried the battles into the Butana. But by the
time the Axumite king Aezanas marched into Kush around A.D. 350, its monarchy apparently no longer
existed. A detailed Axumite inscription makes no mention of the Meroites, but does refer to the Noba, a
people who were known to have harrassed the Meroites from the west bank of the Nile. So the final downfall
of the Kingdom of Kush is veiled in almost complete darkness."
-William Y. Adams, archaeologist,
as quoted in Splendors of the Past: Lost Cities of the Ancient World
Who had a trade monopoly in the African interior?
a. Kush
b. Axum
C. Butana
d. Aezanas

Answer 1

A) KUSH

Step-by-step explanation:

The Kingdom of Kush or Kush was an ancient kingdom located at the Sudanese and southern Egyptian Nile Valley. The kushians had a trade monopoly in the African interior, trading mined minerals and high-quality stones and exotic African goods to Egypt.