Answer:
Yes, we can say that there is statistical evidence that the new system succeeded in lowering the bacterial count.
Explanation:
The question is incomplete. The data for the rooms is:
Room Before After
121 11.8 10.1
163 8.2 7.2
125 7.1 3.8
264 14.0 12.0
233 10.8 8.3
218 10.1 10.5
324 14.6 12.1
325 14.0 13.7
We can calculate the difference in colonies after and before, and analyze this sample.
The difference is for each room:
Room Difference
121 -1.7
163 -1.0
125 -3.3
264 -2.0
233 -2.5
218 0.4
324 -2.5
325 -0.3
The sample size is n=8.
The sample mean is M=-1.6 and the standard deviation is s=1.24.
Then, the degrees of freedom are
We will calculate a 95% confidence interval for the difference in colonies. For a 95% CI and 7 degrees of freedom, the critical valule of t is t=2.365.
Then, the margin of error is:
Then, the lower and upper bounds of the CI are:
With these CI we can conclude that the actual difference in the bacterial count in the rooms is, with 95% confidence, between -0.564 and -2.636. This also indicates that there is only 2.5% confidence that the difference in bacterial count is bigger than -0.564. So there is less than 2.5% that the bacterial count does not succeed (bacterial count equal or higher than 0).
This means that we can say that there is statistical evidence that the new system succeeded in lowering the bacterial count.