Final answer:
The editorial question links the rights of non-smokers to avoid secondhand smoke with the rights of non-car owners to avoid pollution from vehicles, emphasizing that both secondhand smoke and vehicle emissions pose serious health risks, and regulations are in place to protect public health.
Step-by-step explanation:
The editorial question suggests a comparison between the rights of non-smokers to avoid secondhand smoke and the potential rights of non-car owners to reduce air pollution from vehicles. The argument stems from the principle that since non-smokers have the established right to breathe air not polluted by tobacco smoke, it stands to reason that those who do not own cars may assert a similar right regarding the air quality impacted by car emissions.
Over time, science has definitively shown that secondhand smoke can cause severe health issues in non-smokers. The only way to completely protect non-smokers from these dangers is to eliminate indoor smoking. Moreover, measures like separate smoking sections and air purification do not fully eliminate secondhand smoke exposure. Similarly, motor vehicle emissions contribute significantly to air pollution and the creation of smog, with serious health consequences. According to a study, vehicle emissions are linked to tens of thousands of early deaths each year in the U.S. alone, highlighting the public's stake in air quality just as much as in the case of smoking regulations.