190k views
1 vote
Fernando wrote an argument in favor of a ban on

bottled water. He then came upon a new source. In a
well-structured paragraph, explain how Fernando
should adjust his argument based on the new
information.

User Radbyx
by
5.6k points

2 Answers

5 votes

Answer:

Fernando should keep his claim the same. He should also keep the information about how plastic water bottles pollute the land and oceans. He should then add the new information about how plastic bottles have BPA and tell how that might hurt people. He should finish by listing the ways that plastic water bottles are bad for the environment and health.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Philbot
by
6.0k points
4 votes

Answer:

  • Fernando should hold the same opinion regarding the ban on water bottles. He should not change it, despite his new source.
  • His new argument should be more focused on the conversation of environment. This can be done by mentioning the cons of plastic on seas and animals like dolphins etc.
  • He should also mention the hazardous effects this material has on human beings, since it contributes to pollution.
  • He can finish his argument by suggesting new ways on how to stop the usage of plastic bottles, along with this he should also mention alternative materials to plastic bottles.

User Amuser
by
5.2k points