Answer:
a) Since we are conducting a left tailed test and the significance level is
we need to find a critical value on the left tail that accumulate 0.01 of the area on the left and we got
![z_(cric)= -2.326](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/srbx2v5nzk9u4mltn4uts5slws490mueq6.png)
And the rejection zone of the null hypothesis would be
![z<-2.326](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/oc6419ip6tcbv7mjdg6azmjgbqqhvx6l8o.png)
b) For this case since the statistic calculated is -3.33 <--2.326 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 1 % of significance for this case.
Explanation:
1) Concepts and formulas to use
We can asume that we need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion is lower than 0.33:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitc, and the is given by:
(1)
The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion
is significantly different from a hypothesized value
.
Calculate the statistic
For this case the statistic calculated is
![z_(calc)= -3.33](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/jtkp49cx11uvyhuohqduox1slkwp4zexz2.png)
Part a
Since we are conducting a left tailed test and the significance level is
we need to find a critical value on the left tail that accumulate 0.01 of the area on the left and we got
![z_(cric)= -2.326](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/srbx2v5nzk9u4mltn4uts5slws490mueq6.png)
And the rejection zone of the null hypothesis would be
![z<-2.326](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/mathematics/college/oc6419ip6tcbv7mjdg6azmjgbqqhvx6l8o.png)
Part b
For this case since the statistic calculated is -3.33 <--2.326 we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 1 % of significance for this case.