Question

Explain how it is easier to win monetary damages ($) than a criminal conviction?

Answer 1

In civil cases, it is easier to win monetary damages ($) than a criminal conviction due to the lower burden of proof in civil cases and the types of disputes involved.

Step-by-step explanation:

In civil cases, it is generally easier to win monetary damages ($) than a criminal conviction. This is primarily because the burden of proof is different in civil and criminal cases. In a civil case, the plaintiff must prove their case beyond a preponderance of the evidence, which means that the evidence weighs more in their favor. However, in a criminal case, the state must prove the case beyond a reasonable doubt, which is a much higher burden of proof. Additionally, civil cases often involve the resolution of disputes over money or property, while criminal cases involve the potential loss of freedom.

Answer 2

It is easier to win monetary damages than a criminal conviction because the consequences of a crime is much severe than a monetary damage, the punishment differ when it comes between criminal and civil cases.

Step-by-step explanation:

There is a massive difference between a crime and civil, a criminal case is a cause that affects the state, authorities as well as the public, like murdering a person, whereas a monetary damage affects the individual that was affected but not the state.

It is easier to win monetary damages than a criminal conviction because the consequences of a crime is much severe than a monetary damage, the punishment differ when it comes between criminal and civil cases.

A criminal conviction is persecuted by the state and even given imprisonment for years, whereas the punishment given for a monetary damage as much less consequences than criminal conviction.