193k views
4 votes
XYZ Manufacturing has a document destruction procedure in which emails over one year old are automatically deleted from the company’s network. A trading partner notified XYZ with a credible report that XYZ sent fraudulent invoices via email, and that XYZ should expect to be sued by the trading partner. A little over a year later, the litigation commences as predicted, and XYZ’s management issues a litigation hold to stop automatic email destruction. Under the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), XYZ’s litigation hold was most likely too late.

1. True
2. Flase

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

1. True

Step-by-step explanation:

Under the U.S. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), XYZ’s litigation hold was most likely too late.

Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (FRCP), states that litigation actions must commence immediately.

Hence, XYZ’s litigation hold was truly too late an action.

User Matthew Jacobs
by
7.8k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.