What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal? It was found in South Japan It is dated from about 605-600 million years ago The fossils had parts of sponges and

What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal?

It was found in South Japan
It is dated from about 605-600 million years ago
The fossils had parts of sponges and cnidarians
It is from the Edicaran Period

1 Answer

What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal? It was found in South Japan It is dated from about 605-600 million years ago The fossils h…

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Related questions

Categories

Other Questions