Register
What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal? It was found in South Japan It is dated from about 605-600 million years ago The fossils had parts of sponges and
211k views
3 votes
What is not true about the earliest fossil evidence found for a multi-cellular animal?

It was found in South Japan
It is dated from about 605-600 million years ago
The fossils had parts of sponges and cnidarians
It is from the Edicaran Period

User ShaneQful
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

3 votes
It is from the Edicaran Period
User Boris Barroso
by
8.4k points
← Prev Question Next Question →

Related questions

User Ashey
asked Jan 23, 2019 55.4k views
The earliest animals on earth probably arose from colonial protists, so what does the body plan of the sponges suggest?
Ashey asked Jan 23, 2019
by Ashey
8.4k points
1 answer
5 votes
55.4k views
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

9.4m questions

12.2m answers

Other Questions

Which of the objects is living or nonliving: Bacteria, virus, moss, you, a lemon seed, the air, bread, lettuce and rocks?
Why aren't all minerals gemstones?
What are three important types of forces
Two methods of active transport
How can paleontologists help us understand the past
Link Copied!