Answer:
We reject null hypothesis.
Explanation:
We are given that Tango Furniture sells furniture online, arriving at customers homes needing to be assembled. Suppose 3.6% of their Viridian chairs arrive without all the parts.
In trying to improve the system, Hakim reorganizes the packaging system of the Viridian and after testing 500 chairs, only 1% have missing parts.
We have to test is this result a statistically significant improvement.
Let p = % of Viridian chairs arrive without all the parts
SO, Null Hypothesis,
: p
3.6% {means that % of Viridian chairs arrive without all the parts is greater than or equal to 3.6%}
Alternate Hypothesis,
: p < 3.6% {means that % of Viridian chairs arrive without all the parts is less than 3.6%}
The test statistics that will be used here is One-sample z proportion statistics;
T.S. =
~ N(0,1)
where,
= % of Viridian chairs arrive without all the parts in a testing of
500 chairs = 1%
n = sample of chairs = 500
So, test statistics =
= -5.843
Since in the question we are not given with the significance level so we assume it to be 5%. So, at 0.05 level of significance, the z table gives critical value of -1.6449 for one-tailed test. Since our test statistics is less than the critical value of z so we have sufficient evidence to reject null hypothesis as it will fall in the rejection region.
Therefore, we conclude that % of Viridian chairs arrive without all the parts is less than 3.6% which means that there is statistically significant improvement.