208k views
3 votes
American political history can be understood as a perennial battle between state power and national power. The Civil War is perhaps the greatest instance of this conceptual (and violent) struggle, but it is a struggle that spans from the founding to our current climate. Should more or less power be given to the national government than currently exists ? Explain your answer using relevant topics and arguments (for example, debates over gay marriage, gun control, educational standards, environmental protections, etc.).

2 Answers

4 votes

Final answer:

American political history has been characterized by a constant struggle between state power and national power. The question of whether more or less power should be given to the national government than currently exists is complex and continuing.

Step-by-step explanation:

American political history has been characterized by a constant struggle between state power and national power. This battle can be seen throughout different periods of American history, including the Civil War. The question of whether more or less power should be given to the national government than currently exists is a complex one that continues to be debated today.

One argument for giving more power to the national government is that it can provide consistent laws and regulations across the country. For example, the debate over gay marriage has largely been settled at the national level, with the Supreme Court ruling that same-sex marriage is legal in all states. This ensures that same-sex couples have the same rights and protections regardless of where they live.

On the other hand, some argue that more power should be given to state governments in order to allow for local control and decision-making. This can be seen in debates over gun control, where different states have implemented their own regulations based on their specific needs and values.

Ultimately, the question of how much power should be given to the national government is a complex and ongoing one. It requires careful consideration of the specific issues at hand and the potential benefits and drawbacks of centralizing power or decentralizing it to the states.

User Hrvoje Miljak
by
5.0k points
3 votes

Answer:

The battle of who should hold more power, the national government or the states, is perhaps the most seasoned battle in American history. Many believe that the states should hold more control over the national government, yet I differ sometimes. In the present society we have progressing banters about numerous points that worry general society. One of the huge issues that gets talked about frequently is whether maryjane ought to be authorized or not. I am fair with regards to this specific point, yet I do have a solid feeling on who ought to choose. At this moment, there are a few states around the nation that have authorized it, however the National government has not. This makes things incredibly confounding most definitely. The other concern I have is with the detained populace because of cannabis infringement. I think that its unjustifiable that there are individuals getting detainment charges for accomplishing something that another resident in a neighboring state is openly doing. I comprehend that individuals are worried about the possibility that that on the off chance that we permit the national government to settle on choices like this, at that point they will develop to be excessively ground-breaking, however I differ right now. There are measures set up to adjust the forces of the government, and we should confide in what the organizers had as a top priority when they drafted the constitution. At the point when they made the constitution, they gave the central government all the forces they figured they ought to have Article 1 area 8. They did this with the aim that they would shield the central government from getting excessively huge. The originators were clever people however, and they realized that the issues written in 1787 would not be the main ones to cross the ways of the American individuals. Considering this they included the "essential and legitimate statement", which was added to guarantee they could manage issues that emerged later on.

User Robsonsanches
by
4.8k points