Answer:
I will combine both methods given that they have their advantages and disadvantages.
Step-by-step explanation:
When an interviewer prepares a particular set of predetermined questions in advance, this is referred to as Structured Interview.
Unstructured Interview on the other hand refers to an interview in which the questions to be asked to the respondents are not set in advance.
Using the structural technique helps the interviewer to save time, look professional and enables him or her do a thorough assessment. It is not unlikely however that as the prospects give answers to the predetermined question, that other grey areas requiring more clarity or information may arise.
When this happens, unrehearsed questions would have to be administered.
A combination of both techniques therefore will increase the likelihood of getting the best candidate for the roles at first try.
What this means for the business is that
- it reduces the Time Taken To Fill the roles
- because time take to fill is reduced, the company can close up the gap in the human capital value addition process thus increasing it's net value
- the business will experience quicker take off of it's expansion strategies.
Cheers!