6.7k views
2 votes
19. Which of the following evidence would always be admissible in-court?

User Ebottard
by
4.9k points

1 Answer

6 votes

Answer:

"Evidence that is formally presented before the trier of fact (i.e., the judge or jury) to consider in deciding the case. The trial court judge determines whether or not the evidence may be proffered. To be admissible in court, the evidence must be relevant (i.e., material and having probative value) and not outweighed by countervailing considerations (e.g., the evidence is unfairly prejudicial, confusing, a waste of time, privileged, or based on hearsay). Also termed competent evidence; proper evidence; legal evidence."

Step-by-step explanation:

User DiglettPotato
by
5.6k points