Question

Compare and contrast the two settlements shown in the videos (Dhaka, Bangladesh and the favela outside of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil). Consider political, social, economic, and environmental issues.

Answer 1

The populations of squatter settlements are sustained because they are needed because of how poor the settlements are and they need more people to help , or they are attracted to the settlement for some reason such as a specific resource that attracted others which is most likely the reason for the settlement. Reasons that it would be a squatter settlement because they would be focused on one resource and not realize there is a abstinence of other important resources. I predict for Dhaka that it will more likely fail because of the abstinence of important resources. On the other hand the city of Fevla would have a better outcome because it has the resources it needs to grow.

Step-by-step explanation:

2nd and 3rd question

Answer 2

the cities have different populations and cost of living

Step-by-step explanation:

The city of Dhaka is in the Asian country of Bangladesh. This is a small country, tucked in the small Hispanic region in the continent. In addition, the country's population has a high population density. Rio de Janeiro is a pouplus city in Brazil in the South American continent. The main language is Portuguese. The price of living in Rio de Janeiro is higher than that in Dhakar. The consumer prices in Dhakar are higher than that in Rio de Janeiro.