Final answer:
Data to support the negative environmental impact of human resource consumption should include evidence of habitat destruction, unsustainable resource utilization, and the link between increased fossil fuel use and climate change. The rapid growth of human population and its disproportionate negative impact on biodiversity and natural resources illustrates the severity of this issue.
Step-by-step explanation:
To support the claim that the consumption of natural resources by humans has a negative impact on the environment, one would need data showcasing the association between human population growth and adverse environmental outcomes. Relevant data could include statistics on habitat destruction, unsustainable resource use, and the decline of wildlife populations due to unsustainable fishing and hunting. Additionally, evidence of climate change accelerated by the excessive use of fossil fuels, resulting in biodiversity loss, would be pertinent. This is because each additional person on the planet amplifies the depletion and degradation of resources, leading to further environmental strain.
Desertification, topsoil loss, depletion of the ozone layer, and global climate changes are all clear indicators of environmental stress caused by human actions. When presenting evidence, a direct correlation between rapidly increasing human consumption and these environmental changes must be established. With a human population nearing 7 billion, our actions significantly affect the planet's capacity to support a diverse range of species, highlighting the increased competition for resources and ensuing biodiversity loss.