Question

In the case below, the original source material is given along with a sample of student work. Determine the type of plagiarism.

Original Source MaterialOther major issues involve the accepted methods by which fidelity is measured. There are two major methods described in the literature for fidelity measurement. The first is through mathematical measurement that calculates the number of identical elements shared between the real world and the simulation; the greater the number of shared identical elements, the higher the simulation fidelity. A second method to measure fidelity is through a trainees' performance matrix.References:Liu, D., Blickensderfer, E. L., Macchiarella, N. D., & Vincenzi, D. A. (2009). Simulation fidelity. In D. A. Vincenzi, J. A. Wise, M. Mouloua & P. A. Hancock (Eds.), Humanfactors in simulation and training (pp. 61-73). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Student Version:
Liu et al. (2009) identified two major methods for measuring fidelity. The first is a mathematical (objective) method that requires counting "the number of identical elements shared between the real world and the simulation; the greater the number of shared identical elements, the higher the simulation fidelity" (p. 62). The second method involves a performance matrix that compares a human's performance in the simulation with that person's real-world performance, producing an indirect measure of fidelity.References:Liu, D., Blickensderfer, E. L., Macchiarella, N. D., & Vincenzi, D. A. (2009). Simulation fidelity. In D. A. Vincenzi, J. A. Wise, M. Mouloua & P. A. Hancock (Eds.), Humanfactors in simulation and training (pp. 61-73). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
1. Which of the following is true for the Student Version above?O Word-for-Word plagiarismO Paraphrasing plagiarismO This is not plagiarism

Answer 1

Paraphrasing plagiarism

Step-by-step explanation:

From the above the student paraphrases the above work although however explains it properly and would not be considered plagiarism if he had only referenced his work properly. It is noticed from the above that the student has copied the references of the original authors work and has not referenced his work correctly. This is wrong and could be seen as wrongly attributing the source of his work.