Question

Which, if any, of Gibson's arguments against judicial review remain relevant today?

a-Legislators are the repository of the people's sovereignty, and the exercise of judicial review is an act of sovereignty, which should reside with the legislators or the people.
b-Judicial review could lead to political turmoil if the other branches of government, or the states, refuse to acquiesce to the court's interpretation of the constitution.
c-Judicial review makes the judiciary equal or even superior to the legislator, even though judges are not elected.
d-All officers of the government take an oath to support the constitution and therefore all must consider the constitutionality of their actions.
e-The judiciary is not infallible. Judges' errors in interpreting the Constitution cannot be corrected at the ballot box, only by Constitutional amendment.

Answer 1

Judicial review could lead to political turmoil if the other branches of government, or the states, refuse to acquiesce to the court's interpretation of the constitution- Gibson's arguments against judicial review remain relevant today.

Option: B

Step-by-step explanation:

Judiciary system is the pillar of the society or nation's justice. According to the constitution and norms judges take decision to form the justice system. Sometimes judicial review could lead to political turmoil if the other branches of government or the states refuse to acquiesce to the court's interpretation of the constitution.

Its true that if any other state or the other branches of government do not adjust with the judiciary system the whole system will broke down and a political turmoil will occur.