Question

What most accurately captures a criticism about the requirement to take bar examinations in order to become a licensed lawyer? a. Bar exams "cost too much and exact great liabilities" b. Bar exams "psychologically tax the spirit" while "taxing the bar regulators that grade them" c. Bar exams require "extensive preparation without extensive knowledge" d. Bar exams "test too much and too little"

Answer 1

c. Bar exams require "extensive preparation without extensive knowledge"

Step-by-step explanation:

Finishing law school is not enough for someone to become a lawyer. This is because after graduation, you must pass the BAR exam to be considered a lawyer.

However, this exam is very difficult and requires great preparation from your candidates. The biggest problem with this is that the exam requires a lot of preparation, but little knowledge, since candidates end up getting too attached to concepts and guidelines, decorating them often, and not knowing how to apply them in practice.

This ends up generating professionals with little "cleverness" to solve the cases that are involved, as they are attached to decorated concepts that are not always applicable in the real world.

Answer 2

Answer: The best criticizism is that Bar exams "cost too much and exact great liabilities" Option A is the most correct option

Explanation: Bar exams are used to regulate the number of people that are practical layers. This exam is taken after you've successfully graduated from a law school.

The exam has been designed to favor only the rich, as the poor finds it very difficult to pay the fees involved. The law school is very costly, as the books and course handout are always costly. The exam is too costly that you need a loan that should not be less that $140,000 to complete your studies, leading to big liability to pay off, when you have started practicing. Even when you have passed the exams, you are still meant to pay for your license.

The government should try and subsidize the amount of money been paid for Bar exam, as this will help to increase the boundaries of licensing outstanding layers, thereby creating an equal opportunity chance for the rich and the poor to practice law.