81.7k views
4 votes
In a recent study, researchers found that 31 out of 150 boys aged 7-13 were overweight or obese. On the basis of this study can we conclude that more than 15% of the boys aged 7-13 in the sampled population are overweight or obese? Use a 5% level of significance. Give each of the following to receive full credit: 1) the appropriate null and alternative hypotheses; 2) the appropriate test; 3) the decision rule; 4) the calculation of the test statistic; and 5) your conclusion including a comparison to alpha or the critical value

User Gwilym
by
6.5k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

1) Null hypothesis:
p \leq 0.15

Alternative hypothesis:
p > 0.15

2) The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion
\hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value
p_o.

3)
z_(crit)= 1.64

And the rejection zone would be
z>1.64

4) Calculate the statistic


z=\frac{0.207 -0.15}{\sqrt{(0.15(1-0.15))/(150)}}=1.955

5) Statistical decision

For this case our calculated value is on the rejection zone, so we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance and we can conclude that the true proportion is higher than 0.15

Explanation:

Data given and notation

n=150 represent the random sample taken

X=21 represent the boys overweight


\hat p=(31)/(150)=0.207 estimated proportion of boy overweigth


p_o=0.15 is the value that we want to test


\alpha=0.05 represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)


p_v represent the p value (variable of interest)

1) Concepts and formulas to use

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the true proportion of boys obese is higher than 0.15.:

Null hypothesis:
p \leq 0.15

Alternative hypothesis:
p > 0.15

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:


z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{(p_o (1-p_o))/(n)}} (1)

2) The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion
\hat p is significantly different from a hypothesized value
p_o.

3) Decision rule

For this case we need a value on the normal standard distribution who accumulates 0.05 of the area on the right tail and on this case this value is:


z_(crit)= 1.64

And the rejection zone would be
z>1.64

4) Calculate the statistic

Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:


z=\frac{0.207 -0.15}{\sqrt{(0.15(1-0.15))/(150)}}=1.955

5) Statistical decision

For this case our calculated value is on the rejection zone, so we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance and we can conclude that the true proportion is higher than 0.15

User Monie Corleone
by
6.1k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.