Answer:
1) Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
2) The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion
is significantly different from a hypothesized value
.
3)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30b55/30b55af1e23a839efca59e8ed1ab19993671cd40" alt="z_(crit)= 1.64"
And the rejection zone would be
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bb03/7bb03f428e299c49edf84c92b2e00b99db24662c" alt="z>1.64"
4) Calculate the statistic
5) Statistical decision
For this case our calculated value is on the rejection zone, so we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance and we can conclude that the true proportion is higher than 0.15
Explanation:
Data given and notation
n=150 represent the random sample taken
X=21 represent the boys overweight
estimated proportion of boy overweigth
is the value that we want to test
represent the significance level
Confidence=95% or 0.95
z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)
represent the p value (variable of interest)
1) Concepts and formulas to use
We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the true proportion of boys obese is higher than 0.15.:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:
(1)
2) The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion
is significantly different from a hypothesized value
.
3) Decision rule
For this case we need a value on the normal standard distribution who accumulates 0.05 of the area on the right tail and on this case this value is:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30b55/30b55af1e23a839efca59e8ed1ab19993671cd40" alt="z_(crit)= 1.64"
And the rejection zone would be
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7bb03/7bb03f428e299c49edf84c92b2e00b99db24662c" alt="z>1.64"
4) Calculate the statistic
Since we have all the info requires we can replace in formula (1) like this:
5) Statistical decision
For this case our calculated value is on the rejection zone, so we have enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis at 5% of significance and we can conclude that the true proportion is higher than 0.15