Answer:
No, the assumption is not reasonable.
Step-by-step explanation:
The density
of a white dwarf star is
; therefore, the mass
of a basketball-sized fragment of white dwarf will be
![M =\rho V](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/physics/college/ehtd5sckw84vl8kujjuphmftnyjdbv9mbk.png)
where
is the volume of the fragment.
For radius
, the volume will be
![V= (4)/(3) \pi (0.1)^3\\\\V = 4.12*10^(-3)\:m^3](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/physics/college/zg71r59cwtifg97rlb8sah6sixrckjrzyg.png)
Therefore, the mass
of the fragment is
![M =\rho V= (1*10^9kg/m^3)* (4.12*10^(-3)\:m^3)](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/physics/college/90pzrpf9oy2bz5dsmyr9n7u6saavrhhd0q.png)
![\boxed{M = 4.12*10^6kg}](https://img.qammunity.org/2021/formulas/physics/college/y2qamprzhtf000rjy8fsp6f2uvk3fae9qv.png)
which greater than the weight of an average airplane. So could the physicist carry this weight back to his laboratory? Nope. This assumption that he could carry a weight larger than an airplane is unreasonable. No human or animal can lift this much.