Answer:
a) -4
b) 4 units
c) no values; h(x) is always greater than m(x)
Explanation:
__
a) In order to evaluate the difference of the functions, we need to know the value of m(16). We can tell that the x-values in the table increase by 2 at the same time the m(x) values increase by 1. Extending the table in this fashion to x=16, we add the column x=16, m(x)=6. Thus m(16) = 6.
Evaluating the function h(x) for x=4, we get ...
h(4) = (1/2)(4 -2)^2 = (1/2)(4)
h(4) = 2
So, the desired difference is ...
h(4) -m(16) = 2 -6 = -4
__
b) The y-intercept of h(x) is the value of h(0):
h(0) = 1/2(0 -2)^2 = 2
We already know that m(x) increases by 1 when x increases by 2, so the slope is 1/2. Using a point-slope form of the equation of a line, we can write m(x) as ...
y = m(x -a) +b . . . . . . for a line with slope m through the point (a, b)
m(x) = (1/2)(x -8) +2 = 1/2x -2
Then the y-intercept of m(x) is -2.
The two y-intercepts differ in value by ...
2 -(-2) = 4
The y-intercepts are 4 units apart.
__
c) A graph of the two functions shows that h(x) is more than m(x) for all values of x. We can show that analytically by looking at the difference m(x) -h(x).
Subtracting h(x) from m(x), we want to know where this difference is positive.
m(x) -h(x) = (1/2x -2) -(1/2)(x -2)^2
= 1/2x -2 -1/2(x^2 -4x +4)
= -1/2x^2 +5/2x -4
= -1/2(x^2 -5x +8)
We can rewrite the quadratic factor in vertex form as ...
x^2 -5x +8 = (x^2 -5x +6.25) +1.75 = (x -2.5)^2 +1.75
This factor is positive everywhere, so the difference
m(x) -h(x) = -1/2(some positive number)
will be negative everywhere. That is, there are no values of x that make m(x) greater than h(x).