Final answer:
According to the provided graphic organizer, not credible Internet sources include those allowing user-generated content like Wikipedia. Researchers should verify information across multiple platforms and prioritize sources from academic or government domains for credible and unbiased information.
Step-by-step explanation:
When assessing the credibility of Internet sources, specific criteria are used to determine whether the source can be trusted. According to the graphic organizer, credible websites often have domains such as .gov or .edu, indicating that they are associated with either government bodies or educational institutions. In contrast, not credible sources might include social media platforms or websites that allow user-generated content, such as blogs.
The not credible source mentioned in the graphic organizer is wikipedia.com. While Wikipedia can be a starting point for research, it allows user editing, which leads to questions about its authority and reliability. It's important for researchers to seek out information on websites that have established credibility, such as those affiliated with academic or government organizations.
To ensure the use of authoritative and unbiased sources, one should check the domain of the website, consult multiple sources to verify information, and prefer academic journals, government publications, or reputable, fact-checked news outlets over commercial or user-edited websites.