129k views
3 votes
Constitutional scholars have pointed out there is an inconsistency in justice marshall’s opinion with respect to what the constitution specifically provides. What is that inconsistency?

1 Answer

1 vote

Answer:

The inconsistency is that constitution was not given the authority to issue a Writ.

Explanation: The constitution wasn't given the authority to issue a writ or a written command.

A Writ is the one fundamental right of supreme Court In common law, it is a formal written order issued by a body with administrative or judicial jurisdiction, usually a court.

The common types of writ are, prerogative writs, warrants and subpoenas among other forms of writs that are in existence or have existed before now.

User Sinoroc
by
5.0k points