Final answer:
Binh made mistakes in graphing the y-intercepts and identifying the point of intersection. The correct y-intercept for y = x - 3 is (0, -3), and for y = -1/2x - 3/2, it is (0, -3/2). The correct point of intersection for the two lines is (1, -2), not (0, -3).
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine the errors in Binh's graphing of the system of equations, let's analyze each statement:
Looking at each equation:
-
- For y = x minus 3, the y-intercept occurs when x=0, so y = 0 - 3 = -3. The y-intercept should be (0, -3), not (0, 3) as Binh graphed.
-
- For y = -1/2x - 3/2, when x=0, y = -3/2. So the correct y-intercept is (0, -3/2), not (0, -1/2).
To find the point of intersection, we would set the two equations equal to each other and solve for x:
x - 3 = -1/2x - 3/2
Multiplying through by 2 to clear fractions, we get:
2x - 6 = -x - 3
3x = 3
x = 1
Plugging x back into either original equation gives y = -2. Therefore, the correct point of intersection is indeed (1, -2), not (0, -3) as Binh claimed.