Question

Gabe is browsing movies in a video store when he sees a man fall to the ground. Gabe has had a CPR and first aid class before, and upon examining the victim, Gabe determines that he should give a CPR until the ambulance arrives. He gives the victim CPR and successfully resuscitates him. However, later the victim sues Gabe because while giving him CPR, Gabe broke two of the victim's ribs.

What is the best defense Gabe could use to not be held liable for his actions?

a) Pure comparative negligence
b) Contributory negligence
c) Modified comparative negligence
d) Superseding cause
e) Good Samaritan statutes

Answer 1

Good Samaritan statutes

Answer: Option E.

Step-by-step explanation:

A good Samaritan is an individual who offered help on an intentional premise during a crisis. In spite of the way that an individual should offer first help except if it is an aspect of their responsibilities portrayal. Gabe was qualified in light of the fact that he has had CPR and medical aid classes previously and effectively revived the person in question. He can protect himself with the Good Samaritan resolution.

It offers lawful insurance to somebody who rendered help and made a blunder like Gabe when he unintentionally broke two of the exploited people ribs.