Answer:
a) The actuarially fair premium is the same for both group: $1,200
b) A very risk-averse's premium: $1,680
A less risk-averse's premium: $1,500
c) Downside curve
d) 500 people buy insurance.
Consumer surplus for 250 people who are more risk-averse: $480
Consumer surplus for 250 people who are more risk-averse: $300
Insurers' expected profit: 0
e) 250 people who are very risk-averse buy.
Consumer surplus for 250 people who are more risk-averse: $120
Consumer surplus for 250 people who are more risk-averse: -$60
Insurers' expected profit: $90,000
f) The barrier limits consumer surplus but makes insurers profitable.
The effect on social surplus: -$75,000
Step-by-step explanation:
a) $10,000*12%= $1,200
b) A very risk-averse's premium : $1,200 + 40% x $1,200 = $1,680
A less risk-averse's premium : $1,200 + 25% x $1,200 = $1,500
d) The insurance pricing is lower than the prices that people with different risk appetites are willing to pay.
Consumer surplus for 250 people who are more risk-averse: $1,680 - $1,200= $480
Consumer surplus for 250 people who are more risk-averse: $1,500 - $1,200= $300
Insurers' expected profit: 0 because there is no premium.
e) Premium: $1,200 x 130% = $1,560
The premium is still affordable to very risk-averse people who will buy.
Consumer surplus for 250 people who are more risk-averse: $1,680 - $1,560= $120
Consumer surplus for 250 people who are more risk-averse: $1,500 - $1,560= -$60
Insurers' expected profit: 250 x ($1,560 - $1,200) = $90,000
f) The effect on social surplus: 250 x $120 + 250 x (-$60) - $90,000 = -$75,000