Question

Which of the following meetings would be subject to the open-meeting provisions of the federal Sunshine laws? a. a meeting of the staff attorneys of the SEC enforcement division b. a meeting of the nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court c. a meeting of the division heads of the Federal Trade Commission d. a meeting of three of the five commissioners of the Federal Aviation Administration

Answer 1

d. a meeting of three of the five commissioners of the Federal Aviation Administration.

Step-by-step explanation:

Federal Sunshine law was passed in the U.S in the year 1976. It's sole purpose was to ensure that there is transparency in the federal government. This law applies to a country, state, political subdivisions and it makes meetings, voting, records and other official actions available to the public to observe, participate and inspect.

The meeting that would be subject to the open-meeting provisions of the federal sunshine laws would be a meeting of three of the five commissioners of the Federal Aviation Administration.

Answer 2

The correct answer is D. a meeting of three of the five commissioners of the Federal Aviation Administration.

Step-by-step explanation:

Sunshine laws are regulations that require openness in government or business. Sunshine laws make public meetings, records, voting, deliberations and other official actions available for observation, participation and / or inspection. Sunshine laws also require that government meetings be held well in advance and at times and locations that are convenient and accessible to the public, with exceptions for emergency meetings.

In some cases, an event or document that would normally be accessible through the laws of sunlight is closed to public access (as a legally protected matter currently under investigation), but the laws of sunlight are supposed to minimize these exceptions. . Sunshine's laws also differentiate entities that are subject to laws from those that are not. For example, any entity with authority to create binding laws would be subject to the law, but an advisory committee that lacks such authority may not be subject to the laws of sunlight, even if it deals with matters related to government.