Answer:
A. Delaney has committed tortious interference with prospective advantage.
Step-by-step explanation:
A person can be charge with tortious interference with prospective advantage if that person purposefully sabotage a business relationship between the second party and the third party, which lead to monetary damage.
We can see this In the case above,
Delaney is interfering with business relationship between Davis (Second party) and Krauss Corp. (Third party) by threatening with physical harm. Resulting in monetary damage for Davis since he do not obtain the contrast that will give him a nice source of income.