Answer:
Spiro Spammer has violated the CAN-SPAM Act if he has not offered recipients an opportunity to unsubscribe
Step-by-step explanation:
a) option is incorrect because the can-spam act doesn't punish unsolicited commercial e-mails.
c) is incorrect because the CAN_SAPM act doesn't punish the act of asking for money. On the other hand, if he would have sold something or made the promise to sell something and not fulfilling it that would have been a violation of the act.
d) It is incorrect because there is no intrusion or rule broken for sending e-mails if they were not solicited.
However, b) is correct because everything someone sends an unsolicited email that has a chain to keep being delivered, the sender needs to include a way to unsubscribe to that chain of messages.