159k views
3 votes
Do you believe that the $785,000 amount at the center of the Overstock-Grant Thornton dispute was material? Defend your answer. What factors other than quantitative considerations should have been considered in deciding whether the $785,000 amount was material?

User Charas
by
4.1k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer: Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

The $785,000 was material because it meets both the quantitative and qualitative factors for materiality. Quantitatively, it is more than 10% of the net income of the company ($7.7million) and qualitatively, it showed a relaxed attitude of management towards accounting misstatements.

Some factors other than quantitative considerations that can be used to determine the materiality of the amount in question are:

  • Effect on changing loss to profit or profit into loss .
  • Effect of management’s compensation .
  • Effect on the public/shareholders/share prices .
  • Possibility of fraud or conflict of interest .
  • Attitude of management to accounting misstatements .

User Rjz
by
5.0k points