Answer:
C). Can enforce James's pledge on the grounds of promissory estoppel based on a charitable subscription.
Step-by-step explanation:
A charitable subscription is demonstrated as a promise in which a party promises to make a donation to an educational, charitable, or religious institution.
As per the question, Helping Hands Inc. possesses the ability to 'enforce James's pledge on the grounds of promissory estoppel based on a charitable description'. Conventionally, such promises were not enforceable as they are not backed by appropriate legal consideration. But, the modern view allows adding exceptions in the general rule through application of the doctrine of promissory estoppel. Thus, Helping Hands is now allowed to enforce its promise on the basis of promissory estoppel. Hence, option C is the correct answer.