Answer:
is enforceable because Marcy's company was justifiably ignorant of the fact that the goods had been stolen.
Step-by-step explanation:
The contract was drawn on the agreement that Marcy's company would deliver the goods to Wilson. She fulfilled her own part of the contract and so the contract is enforceable.
Even though the goods were stolen, Marcy has met her obligations so Wilson must also meet his obligation of paying Marcy for services rendered.
Marcy's company is ignorant of the theftbso they cannot be stopped form enforcing the contract.