65.8k views
0 votes
Can evidence be relevant but not sufficient? Explain your answer.

User BBacon
by
8.2k points

2 Answers

2 votes

Answer:

I believe so yes

Step-by-step explanation:

It can still be relevant to the topic and what you're writing about, but not help prove your point.

User Birk
by
8.4k points
5 votes

Relevance is ordinarily a necessary condition, but not a sufficient condition, for the admissibility of evidence. For example, relevant evidence may be excluded if its tendency to prove or disprove a fact is heavily outweighed by the possibility that the evidence will prejudice or confuse the jury.

User Nealon
by
8.4k points

No related questions found

Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.