Final answer:
Jack's stance on honesty corresponds to a deontological ethical view, particularly Kantian ethics, which asserts moral decisions should be made based on adherence to universal laws and treating others with inherent value.
Step-by-step explanation:
Jack's reasoning reflects the principles of deontological ethics, particularly those put forth by philosopher Immanuel Kant in his ethical theory. Kant believed that actions are morally right based on whether they follow certain universal moral laws, rather than by their consequences. Jack's determination to be honest, even if it means making less money, suggests that he values honesty as a categorical imperative – an unconditional moral law that must be adhered to in all circumstances. The philosophy here is that lying is inherently wrong regardless of the outcomes it may produce. Kant argued that we must respect the inherent value and dignity of rational beings by treating them as ends in themselves, not merely as means to our own ends. Therefore, Jack seems to be following a Kantian approach to ethics, prioritizing duty and the righteousness of actions over their potential benefits to oneself.