Final answer:
New Urbanism contradicts the principle of Euclidean zoning by integrating various land uses, fostering walkable and inclusive communities, which is opposite to the separation of land uses in Euclidean zoning.
Step-by-step explanation:
The principle that New Urbanism directly contradicts is Euclidean zoning. Euclidean zoning is characterized by the separation of land uses into distinct zones, which contrasts with the New Urbanism approach of integrating various land uses such as housing, retail, commercial, and administrative spaces within the same zones. By promoting mixed-use development and walkability, New Urbanism seeks to create sustainable communities where people of all races and socioeconomic levels can live more closely together.
This approach goes against traditional Euclidean zoning, where residential, industrial, and commercial areas are typically separated into defined sections, leading to increased dependency on automobiles and less community cohesion. The goals of New Urbanism include reducing sprawl, increasing reliance on public transportation like the Transit-Oriented Development, and fostering inclusive neighborhoods, which diverge from the patterns seen in cities with strict Euclidean zoning laws.