Answer:
Judicial Activism.
Step-by-step explanation:
Judicial Activism refers to the judiciary judgment, in which the jury often overlooks the law. In 1947, Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. coined the term "judicial activism". Or, in other words, the term judicial activism can be defined as a decision of the jury that is based on personal opinions rather than on the existing law.
In the given case, the decision of the Supreme Court is an example of Judicial activism because the court's decision was based outside of the law and based solely on their own understanding of public policy.
So, the correct answer is judicial activism.